Our industry specialist has reviewed and approved the final article. Also, some of the data presented here have been integrated into the Santa Ana real estate spreadsheet template.
Thinking of buying in Santa Ana? Get our financial spreadsheet tailored to this specific market.
Thinking about investing in real estate in Santa Ana in 2025? You might want to reconsider.
While the market has been hot in recent years, there are signs that it might not be the best choice moving forward.
In this blog post, we will explore the reasons why investing in Santa Ana real estate could be risky.
We rely on solid data and statistics from trusted sources to guide our analysis.
By the end, we will share our own conclusions based on a thorough examination of the facts. Enjoy the read!
How this content was produced 🔎📝
This article offers thoughtful insights and analysis based on reliable sources, but it should not be considered financial advice. We work hard to research, compile, and analyze data to give you a well-informed perspective. However, as you can guess, our analysis involves subjective choices, such as source selection and methods, and it cannot fully capture the market's complexity. Please, always do your own research, consult professionals, and make decisions based on your own judgment. Any financial risks or losses are your responsibility. Additionally, you should know that we have no affiliation with the sources mentioned, ensuring our analysis is completely impartial.
1) Santa Ana's "price-to-rent ratio" is 41.9, indicating a significantly high level
Signal strength: strong
The price-to-rent ratio in Santa Ana is 41.9, which is considered high. This ratio is a key indicator that helps potential investors understand whether buying a property is financially sensible compared to renting.
When the price-to-rent ratio is high, it suggests that property prices are significantly higher relative to rental income. This means that the cost of buying a home is much greater than what you would earn from renting it out.
In such scenarios, investors might not see a good return on their investment if they choose to buy. Instead, they might find that renting is a more economical choice in the short term.
If the price-to-rent ratio were closer to 15, it would indicate a more balanced market where buying could be more advantageous.
Sources: USCensus, Redfin, Zillow
2) Santa Ana's "livability score" of 51 indicates a significantly poor quality of life
Signal strength: moderate
The livability score of 51 in Santa Ana is a clear indicator that investing in property here might not be the best decision.
One reason for this low score is the high crime rate, which can deter potential buyers and renters, affecting property values. Additionally, the overcrowded schools in the area can be a concern for families, making the location less attractive for long-term residence.
Furthermore, the limited green spaces and recreational areas contribute to a lower quality of life, which can impact the desirability of the neighborhood. These factors combined suggest that the potential for property value appreciation is limited, making it a less appealing investment.
However, if the livability score were to improve significantly, it could indicate a more promising investment opportunity in the future.
Source: AreaVibes
We created this infographic to show how property prices in Santa Ana compare to other big cities in California. It shows the median price as well as the price per sqft, making it easy to see which places might offer the best value. We hope you find it helpful.
3) A local in Santa Ana would need about 9.5 years to afford a house, which is quite a long time
Signal strength: moderate
In Santa Ana, it would take around 9.5 years for a local to buy a house, which is quite high. This is a signal that buying property here might not be the best investment.
The median household income is about $85,914, which is relatively low compared to the cost of homes. Meanwhile, the median home price is around $816,950, making it difficult for locals to afford a home.
When it takes such a long time for locals to buy, it indicates a potential lack of demand from local buyers. This could mean that property values might not increase as much as in other areas.
If the time it took for locals to buy a house was significantly lower, say around 5 years, it might suggest a healthier market for investment.
Source: USCensus
4) Santa Ana, California is experiencing a drop in its population
Signal strength: moderate
The population of Santa Ana, California, has been on a decline, which can be a significant factor when considering property investment. A decreasing population often indicates a reduced demand for housing, as fewer people are looking to buy or rent homes in the area.
From 2000 to 2023, Santa Ana's population decreased by 27,678, with a notable decline since its peak in 2009. This trend suggests that the city might be experiencing economic or social challenges that make it less attractive to potential residents. Between 2021 and 2023, the population further decreased by 627, reinforcing the pattern of decline.
When the population decreases, it can lead to a surplus of available properties, which often results in lower property values. This can make it difficult for property investors to achieve a good return on investment, as the potential for property appreciation is limited.
Additionally, the long-term decline over the last decade, with a decrease of 21,252 people, highlights a persistent trend that may not reverse soon. While California's overall population is growing, Santa Ana's decline suggests that the city is not benefiting from the state's positive growth, potentially due to local issues that need addressing.
Sources: Neilsberg, California Demographics, California Government, US Census Bureau
Our team designed this infographic to show how competitive the real estate market in Santa Ana is vs. other major cities in California. It shows the percentage of sales above the list price, a key indicator of market competition.
5) The "cash-on-cash return" for long-term rentals in Santa Ana is just 3.0%, which is quite low
Signal strength: moderate
The cash-on-cash return of 3.0% in Santa Ana is considered low, indicating that the income generated from the property is not substantial compared to the initial investment. This low return suggests that the property might not be generating enough rental income to cover expenses and provide a satisfactory profit.
In Santa Ana, the rental market is often driven by long-term tenants who are typically families looking for stability and proximity to schools and workplaces. These tenants usually prefer renting over buying due to high property prices and the cost of living in the area, which can limit the potential for rental price increases.
As a result, the rental income potential is somewhat capped, making it challenging to achieve higher returns on investment. This situation is compounded by the fact that property values in Santa Ana have not been appreciating at a rate that would offset the low cash-on-cash return.
For this signal to indicate a good investment, the cash-on-cash return would need to be significantly higher, ideally above 8%, to ensure that the property generates enough income to justify the investment.
Source: Mashvisor
So, is investing in Santa Ana real estate a good idea in 2025? Probably not.
Investing in real estate in Santa Ana in 2025 might not be the best move. Several key indicators suggest that the market is not favorable for investors.
Firstly, the price-to-rent ratio is 41.9, which is quite high. This means that buying a property is much more expensive compared to renting, making it hard to see a good return on investment. Additionally, the livability score is only 51, indicating a poor quality of life due to factors like high crime rates and overcrowded schools, which can deter potential buyers and renters.
Moreover, it takes about 9.5 years for a local to afford a house, suggesting a lack of demand from local buyers. The population is also declining, with a decrease of 27,678 people since 2000, leading to a surplus of properties and lower property values. Lastly, the cash-on-cash return is just 3.0%, which is low and indicates that rental income might not cover expenses or provide a satisfactory profit.
Related analyses:
- Here is why prices are going to climb in 2025 in Santa Ana