Yes, it's actually a better idea to rent your place in San Francisco

Our industry specialist has reviewed and approved the final article. Also, some of the data presented here have been integrated into the San Francisco real estate spreadsheet template.

Thinking of buying in San Francisco? Get our financial spreadsheet tailored to this specific market.

Have you been going back and forth about whether to rent or buy in San Francisco?

It’s a big decision, and honestly, it’s normal to wonder what’s best.

Let’s talk about why renting might actually be the smarter move for you.

This article gives you valuable insights, but remember, it’s not and will never be investment advice. We pull data from a range of sources to provide you with the most accurate picture possible, yet we can’t guarantee complete accuracy. Markets are difficult to predict. Make sure to do your own research and consult a professional before making any financial moves. Any risks or losses are your own responsibility.

1) San Francisco's "price-to-rent ratio" is 30 - it clearly tells us that renting is more cost-effective than buying

In San Francisco, the price-to-rent ratio is about 30, indicating renting is more cost-effective than buying.

A ratio above 21 usually favors renting, and San Francisco's high ratio highlights its expensive property market.

Homeownership involves significant costs like mortgage payments and taxes, while renting offers flexibility and lower upfront costs.

By 2025, with property prices expected to stay high, renting will likely remain the smarter financial choice, allowing residents more financial freedom.

If deciding between renting or buying, the data supports renting as the better option.

Source: Homebay

2) San Francisco's "home value-to-income ratio" is 14:1 (so, renting is a more viable option than buying)

The home value-to-income ratio in San Francisco is 14:1, with median home prices at $1.4 million and median household incomes around $98,000.

This highlights the financial burden of homeownership, as buying a home costs 14 times the average annual income.

The high ratio indicates that homeownership is increasingly out of reach, affecting the city's housing market and economic stability.

By 2025, renting is expected to be more viable than buying, as home prices rise and incomes lag, offering flexibility and less financial strain in a high-cost city.

Sources: Redfin, US News Real Estate

3) In San Francisco, the median monthly rent is $3,295, which is less than the $5,900 average mortgage payment

In San Francisco, the median rent is about $3,295, while the typical mortgage payment is around $5,900, a difference of over $2,600 monthly.

Renting offers affordability, flexibility, and less financial commitment compared to mortgages.

Renters avoid long-term obligations, property taxes, and maintenance costs, allowing more disposable income for savings or enjoying the city's lifestyle.

By 2025, renting is expected to remain attractive due to high homeownership costs, potential interest rate hikes, and property prices, making it a less risky financial choice for many residents.

Sources: Zillow, NBC Bay Area, Mortgage Payments

4) The median home price in San Francisco is $1,352,292, making renting at $2,264 monthly a more financially sound choice

As of November 2024, San Francisco's median home price is $1,352,292, with monthly mortgage payments around $10,045, while renting a one-bedroom apartment costs $2,264 per month.

Homeownership includes additional expenses like property taxes, maintenance, and insurance, increasing costs further.

Renting offers predictable expenses and financial flexibility, crucial in a city with high living costs and economic volatility.

Given these figures, renting in 2025 appears smarter, as it avoids the immense financial burden and risks of homeownership, allowing adaptability in a dynamic market.

Sources: Mortgage Research, Investopedia

5) Owning a Property in San Francisco comes with maintenance costs at $14,000–$56,000

For a $1.4 million property, annual maintenance costs range from $14,000 to $56,000, a burden renters avoid as landlords cover these expenses.

Homeowners must budget for ongoing upkeep, repairs, and replacements, which vary by the home's specifics.

By 2025, renting in San Francisco may be financially wiser due to high property values and maintenance costs.

Renting eliminates these expenses, offering greater financial flexibility in a city with a high cost of living.

Sources: Fool, GomeGuide, Angi

6) The average effective property tax rate in California is 074%, it's significant financial commitment for homeowners

The average effective property tax rate in California is about 0.74% of a property's assessed value.

For a $1.4 million home, this means a base tax of $14,000 annually, which can increase to $16,800 with local assessments like Mello-Roos taxes.

This underscores the financial burden of owning a home in high-value areas like San Francisco.

Proposition 13 limits the general property tax rate to 1% with annual increases capped at 2%, but local taxes can make homeownership costly.

By 2025, renting may be more viable in San Francisco, as it avoids high property taxes and offers financial flexibility without long-term commitments.

Sources: JLLegal, Wikipedia, Tax Rates

Get our spreadsheet tailored to San Francisco!

Our tool covers everything: NOI, COC, Cap Rate, Gross Yield, Net Yield, LTV, ROI, and numerous other metrics and charts.

DOWNLOAD

So, is it better to rent in San Francisco? Absolutely, yes!